On Oct 28, 2010, at 17:46, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > NAT66 doesn't interfere in any way with the use of IPv6 privacy addresses.
Of course not. What it does not do, which I think Mr. Marquis finds lacking, is provide any privacy for interior hosts that are *not* using privacy addresses. My understanding is that this isn't an oversight by the authors, and that we are not here to discuss whether privacy obfuscation is a feature that should be added to the draft. Hopefully, Mr. Marquis and others with similar concerns will come to understand this and take the discussion where it will be more readily received. See? I'm trying to help. -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, communications engineering _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
