On Friday, December 31, 2004, at 5:32:26 PM, Jason Yip wrote:
>> > - The team is responsible for broken builds, not any particular
>> > individual or pair. Particular individuals or pairs involved in the
>> > latest change will be most capable in helping fix a broken build.
>>
>> In the manual build case, if the build breaks, you know you did it.
>> The pair who need the learning are the pair presented with the
>> opportunity.
> Yes. This is the advantage of the purely sequential CI style. I
> would say however, that it is not always *just* the pair that needs
> the learning.
True, but I wouldn't send the whole tribe out after every rabbit
that runs by the village. I'd trust the hunters to bring back
anything of interest.
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
Fatalism is born of the fear of failure, for we all believe that we carry
success in our own hands, and we suspect that our hands are weak. -- Conrad
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
