Hi group, I just saw this question, and neo4j alleged performance worries me too. Especially when remarks like this: <Neo4j's main bottleneck is the memory it consumes. An OSM file up to one gigabyte seems to be the limit for Neo4j; importing larger datasets takes a long time and queries become slow.> What worries me even more is the absence of reactions of Neo4j's TLM. How to convince the world of positive use of Neo4j's graph database when these 'rumors' are not disproved?
Kind regards, Ton On Friday, October 31, 2014 9:10:10 PM UTC+1, gg4u wrote: > > hi, > also interested in this. > i d love to benchmark similar queries against NoSql (dynamo on aws) > could you please share a foo table publicly? > my model on nosql is > node A as index, all neighbors of A as value (a whole string). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
