Interesting to know if Neo Technology gave feedback as requested: We highly appreciate the feedback from Neo Technology representatives! From: http://istc-bigdata.org/index.php/benchmarking-graph-databases-updates/
On Monday, November 3, 2014 4:43:31 PM UTC+1, Ton Akveld wrote: > > Hi group, > > I just saw this question, and neo4j alleged performance worries me too. > Especially when remarks like this: <Neo4j's main bottleneck is the memory > it consumes. An OSM file up to one > gigabyte seems to be the limit for Neo4j; importing larger datasets takes > a long time and queries become > slow.> > What worries me even more is the absence of reactions of Neo4j's TLM. > How to convince the world of positive use of Neo4j's graph database when > these 'rumors' are not disproved? > > Kind regards, > > Ton > > > On Friday, October 31, 2014 9:10:10 PM UTC+1, gg4u wrote: >> >> hi, >> also interested in this. >> i d love to benchmark similar queries against NoSql (dynamo on aws) >> could you please share a foo table publicly? >> my model on nosql is >> node A as index, all neighbors of A as value (a whole string). > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
