Yes, I believe istc-bigdata really appreciated it. Article begins - "Neo Technology representatives contacted us and said..."
Article ends - "We highly appreciate the feedback from Neo Technology representatives!" I think there is still a wait for Kamilos to share further information.. M On Monday, 3 November 2014 17:50:55 UTC, Ton Akveld wrote: > > Interesting to know if Neo Technology gave feedback as requested: *We > highly appreciate the feedback from Neo Technology representatives!* > From: > http://istc-bigdata.org/index.php/benchmarking-graph-databases-updates/ > > On Monday, November 3, 2014 4:43:31 PM UTC+1, Ton Akveld wrote: >> >> Hi group, >> >> I just saw this question, and neo4j alleged performance worries me too. >> Especially when remarks like this: <Neo4j's main bottleneck is the >> memory it consumes. An OSM file up to one >> gigabyte seems to be the limit for Neo4j; importing larger datasets takes >> a long time and queries become >> slow.> >> What worries me even more is the absence of reactions of Neo4j's TLM. >> How to convince the world of positive use of Neo4j's graph database when >> these 'rumors' are not disproved? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Ton >> >> >> On Friday, October 31, 2014 9:10:10 PM UTC+1, gg4u wrote: >>> >>> hi, >>> also interested in this. >>> i d love to benchmark similar queries against NoSql (dynamo on aws) >>> could you please share a foo table publicly? >>> my model on nosql is >>> node A as index, all neighbors of A as value (a whole string). >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
