Hi Michael, Thanks for the insight!
Kind regards, Ton On Monday, November 3, 2014 7:44:42 PM UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote: > > We very much worked with them, even repoduced their dataset and setup and > pointed out the incorrect use and configuration of Neo4j as well as a > shortcoming of their data-model. > > They happily accepted the information but didn't bother to update their > *original* article. > > After our last post > <http://istc-bigdata.org/index.php/benchmarking-graph-databases/> about > benchmarking graph databases, Neo Technology > <http://www.neotechnology.com/> representatives contacted us and said > that they repeated the shortest path queries on Neo4j > <http://www.neotechnology.com/neo4j-graph-database/> with the Facebook > dataset and they observed 2-4 orders of magnitude better performance. This > was an intriguing comment and we were very interested in finding out why > this could be the case. > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Ton Akveld <[email protected] <javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Could be wrong, but I read the article end "We highly appreciate the >> feedback from Neo Technology representatives!" as a wish, not a comment on. >> :-) >> >> >> On Monday, November 3, 2014 6:58:18 PM UTC+1, Mark Findlater wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I believe istc-bigdata really appreciated it. >>> >>> Article begins - "Neo Technology representatives contacted us and >>> said..." >>> >>> Article ends - "We highly appreciate the feedback from Neo Technology >>> representatives!" >>> >>> I think there is still a wait for Kamilos to share further information.. >>> >>> M >>> >>> On Monday, 3 November 2014 17:50:55 UTC, Ton Akveld wrote: >>>> >>>> Interesting to know if Neo Technology gave feedback as requested: *We >>>> highly appreciate the feedback from Neo Technology representatives!* >>>> From: http://istc-bigdata.org/index.php/benchmarking-graph- >>>> databases-updates/ >>>> >>>> On Monday, November 3, 2014 4:43:31 PM UTC+1, Ton Akveld wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi group, >>>>> >>>>> I just saw this question, and neo4j alleged performance worries me too. >>>>> Especially when remarks like this: <Neo4j's main bottleneck is the >>>>> memory it consumes. An OSM file up to one >>>>> gigabyte seems to be the limit for Neo4j; importing larger datasets >>>>> takes a long time and queries become >>>>> slow.> >>>>> What worries me even more is the absence of reactions of Neo4j's TLM. >>>>> How to convince the world of positive use of Neo4j's graph database >>>>> when these 'rumors' are not disproved? >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> >>>>> Ton >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, October 31, 2014 9:10:10 PM UTC+1, gg4u wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> hi, >>>>>> also interested in this. >>>>>> i d love to benchmark similar queries against NoSql (dynamo on aws) >>>>>> could you please share a foo table publicly? >>>>>> my model on nosql is >>>>>> node A as index, all neighbors of A as value (a whole string). >>>>> >>>>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
