Hi Michel,

This is a fare point, 0 - 99 would be allot nicer, I wonder if I should 
just bite the bullet and use an IO port expander IC on the nixie display 
PCB I dont think I have enough room spare on the PCB to implement the 
latches unless I can do it with one IC (do you have any that come to 
mind?).  This would solve all my problems in one go if I can find/make the 
space for it.  I will have a look to see if I can squeeze a SM package onto 
the PCB in the remaining limited space.  

I do like the IN-13 but am sadly too far into the design to make use of 
one.  I do however have a second project on the go which is an audio 
spectrum analyser using IN-9 's :o)  I just wish I had more spare time on 
my hands to spend more time on my many projects.

Regards,
Tim

On Friday, 4 January 2013 22:48:50 UTC, Michel wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Not that I want to influence your design but it sounds a bit odd to have 
> the nixies go from 0 to 63 in a valve (pre)amplifier. It is really related 
> to something digital that IMHO doesn't really match a design of a valve 
> amplifier. I think it is nicer if it would go from 0 to 99. If you use a 
> few latches before the 74141 that would solve all your limited I/O 
> problems. Another thing that comes to mind is using an IN-13 bar graph tube 
> to indicate the position of the volume button.
>
> Michel
>
>
>
>
>
> on Jan 05, 2013, *Tim* <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your reply David.  My reason for multiplexing was due to not 
> having enough spare pins on the PIC, however having givin this considerable 
> thought I have the IO pins that were being used to switch the MSD and LSD 
> anode transistors and a third IO pin which was available to control the 
> enable pin for the tayloredge SMPS, so by using these three pins allows me 
> to to have 0 - 7 on the MSD which is great as I wanted 64 steps to 
> indicate  the volume control potentiometer position.  
>
> Sadly there is a but to this (is there not always) I need to be able to 
> blank the digits which normally involves using all 4 bits of the 74141.  
> Now as I do not need 7 - 9 I was thinking I could shift all the digits 
> along one position, so 0 in the nixie is connected to 1 on the 74141 1 to 2 
> and so on.  This results in being able to blank the nixie by sending 000 to 
> ABC and having D permanently tied to ground.  This digit shift being easy 
> to work around in the firmware.
>
> I can position the SMPS in such a way that it will not interfere with the 
> audio signal path so I would like to try and stick with it for the nixie HT 
> supply as the valve HT supply has a delayed start to give chance for the 
> soft started heaters to warm up. I want the volume indication to come on at 
> power up with a possible count down on it to show the remaining warm up 
> time. Additionally to this I am trying to keep the analogue and digital 
> power rails separate from one another.
>
> This is where my questions begin:  Can I leave the cathodes 7 - 9 
> floating or do they need to be tied to something? Will floating digits 
> ghost? I would also like to 
> keep my enable signal to disable the SMPS when the amplifier is in standby 
> so can I use the now unused 0 output on the 74141 as a logic 
> signal to drive the enable pin on the SMPS?  The only trouble with this is 
> when blanking the nixie the SMPS will be disabled unless I use extra logic 
> to look at the LSD bits?  (I guess it is quite environmentally friendly to 
> turn the SMPS off when the digits are blank but if I was worried about this 
> then I guess I would not be building a power hungry inefficient valve 
> amplifier!)
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 22:25:13 UTC, nixiebunny wrote:
>>
>> On 1/2/13 3:01 PM, Tim wrote:
>>
>> > I am in the process of building an audio preamp using valves and I am
>>
>> > using nixie tubes to indicate the volume control position.  I am using
>>
>> > two nixie tubes to indicate the volume and they are being multiplexed
>>
>> > via a PIC and 74141.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > My question to you fine folk is how should I provide power to the nixie
>>
>> > tubes.  I have two options available to me:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Regards,
>>
>> > Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> Tim,
>>
>>
>>
>> If you can afford the extra four pins on the PIC and another 74141, then 
>>
>> you can run the tubes direct (non-multiplexed) and not worry about it.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you will be multiplexing them, then the power supply will not conduct 
>>
>> the noise to any noticeable extent. You will need a high anode  resistor 
>>
>> value, so you can insert a simple two-stage RC low-pass filter (10K 
>>
>> series, 0.1uf polyester shunt) between the power supply and the anode 
>>
>> resistors to eliminate noise from the anode power.
>>
>>
>>
>> You will want to be careful about mounting the display unit away from 
>>
>> the input stage of the amplifier, to prevent radiated noise from getting 
>>
>> into the input stage where it will be amplified.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> David Forbes, Tucson AZ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "neonixie-l" group.
>
> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] <javascript:>.
>
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/wzW1euMoJw0J.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/reDXte0aTDkJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to