On 14-04-02 05:19 PM, Instrument Resources of America wrote:
P.S. Maybe someone here can elaborate on why Raytheon numbered it as
0Z4G rather than 0Z4GT which would have made more sense, and adhered to
"industry tube standards". As I do not have clue. Ira.
I looked and could not find the G version in the JEDEC files.
My guess is that it really did come out as a G version, like a 6V6G,
50l6G etc, but the tiny little bulb is of course much smaller than the
"Bantam" (GT or T9 size) Most G tubes had an ST bulb
--
Charles MacDonald Stittsville Ontario
[email protected] Just Beyond the Fringe
http://Charles.MacDonald.org/tubes
No Microsoft Products were used in sending this e-mail.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/533CBFAF.4080305%40zeusprune.ca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
