On 4/2/2014 6:55 PM, Charles MacDonald wrote:
On 14-04-02 05:19 PM, Instrument Resources of America wrote:P.S. Maybe someone here can elaborate on why Raytheon numbered it as 0Z4G rather than 0Z4GT which would have made more sense, and adhered to "industry tube standards". As I do not have clue. Ira.I looked and could not find the G version in the JEDEC files.My guess is that it really did come out as a G version, like a 6V6G, 50l6G etc, but the tiny little bulb is of course much smaller than the "Bantam" (GT or T9 size) Most G tubes had an ST bulb
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/533CCDAA.1060609%40HUGHES.NET. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<<attachment: IRACOSALES.vcf>>
