I have here an addendum from RCA to their 0Z4 datasheet eric
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles MacDonald Sent: donderdag 3 april 2014 3:56 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Trigger clock revisited On 14-04-02 05:19 PM, Instrument Resources of America wrote: > P.S. Maybe someone here can elaborate on why Raytheon numbered it as > 0Z4G rather than 0Z4GT which would have made more sense, and adhered to > "industry tube standards". As I do not have clue. Ira. I looked and could not find the G version in the JEDEC files. My guess is that it really did come out as a G version, like a 6V6G, 50l6G etc, but the tiny little bulb is of course much smaller than the "Bantam" (GT or T9 size) Most G tubes had an ST bulb -- Charles MacDonald Stittsville Ontario [email protected] Just Beyond the Fringe http://Charles.MacDonald.org/tubes No Microsoft Products were used in sending this e-mail. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/533CBFAF.4080305%40zeusprune.ca . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAPDddShx705MuX20yCpp0vvCgAAAEAAAAD0YbAuJB/NAuwPqDuZdG0EBAAAAAA%3D%3D%40zeelandnet.nl. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0Z4G_data.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
