They are nice lookinng clocks, BTW there is an option to select English as 
the language on the web site.

The LC-516 looks like a polish version of the IN-1. Does it have the same 
issue with tube lifetime? i.e. does it also not include mercury to extend 
the life of the tube?

On Friday, March 17, 2017 at 12:14:11 PM UTC-4, Tomasz Kowalczyk wrote:
>
> Direct driven nixie clock don't have to be brighter. Many multiplexed ones 
> are driven with higher pulse current - which is still acceptable according 
> to datasheets (it was acceptable to drive nixies with half-wave rectified 
> mains! Something that no one with brains would design today). It again 
> comes to decision of constructor - better visibility or undercurrenting to 
> increase life*. I personally have built only one clock, with Z566M tubes, 
> which are in my opinion the most beautuful tubes - right proportions, high 
> quality, curved digits and great thickness of gas coating around digits. I 
> am multiplexing them at 4mA (datasheets suggest 4,5mA in direct drive) and 
> digits are barely visible in strong sunlight - as spring is around the 
> corner, I will probably adjust it to around 8-10mA, because more and more 
> sun will come to my room :)
> *I am not sure if strong undercurrenting will increase tube life. I aim at 
> point between lowest and average value in datasheet.
>
> Keith, I would suggest searching for top view tube clocks. They are 
> generally cheaper, but in my opinion they look as good as side view tubes, 
> they are less likely to be broken and these can actually look good with LED 
> underlight (this is a phenomena I can't understand - in tube clock, the 
> nixies should be the main thing that catches your eye). There is a small 
> company in Poland, which creates beautiful clocks using Polish end view 
> tubes: LC-513 and LC-516, which are (as far as I know) interchangeable with 
> IN-1 and Z560M, respectively. These clocks can be purchased as finished 
> products or as kits.
>
> http://www.electronixclock.pl/nasze-zegary/zegary-gotowe/electronixclock-4xlc516/
>
> http://www.electronixclock.pl/nasze-zegary/zegary-gotowe/electronixclock-4xlc513/
> Both cost about 125$ without shipping.
> Unfortunately, the site is in Polish only - but if you want, I can try to 
> get them to contact with you. These clocks are well documented, as they are 
> open source projects (again, documentation is avaible only on Polish forum 
> elektroda.pl, I will find links and help to translate them if needed).
> If not those clocks, try searching for Z560M clocks - those are beautiful 
> and cheap tubes (here in Poland about 2,5$ for used tube)
>
>
> W dniu czwartek, 16 marca 2017 15:34:05 UTC+1 użytkownik Paul Andrews 
> napisał:
>>
>> I like the clocks from these guys: 
>> http://www.ebay.com/usr/gra_and_afch_2?_trksid=p2053788.m1543.l2754 They 
>> are direct drive so as bright as they can be. They come in various forms, 
>> so you would probably want to make sure you at least bought one with the 
>> arduino included. They have one with a case here: 
>>
>>
>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/IN-14-NIXIE-Tubes-Clock-Musical-USB-RGB-Arduino-Divergence-Meter-GRA-AFCH-/162261613376?hash=item25c78bbb40:g:l2wAAOSwB09YFdZE
>>
>> On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 2:43:36 PM UTC-5, Keith wrote:
>>>
>>> I am wanting to purchase a nixie tube clock already built but I would 
>>> like to get one that has the most brightness. I was looking at in-18 size 
>>> nixie tubes. When looking at some the brightness is not that bright. So far 
>>> I found this one to be a brightest unless it's just Photoshop or because 
>>> the ambient lighting around it is darker. Does anyone have any 
>>> recommendations for where to buy one that has a good reputation but does 
>>> not cost an arm and a leg like this does?
>>>
>>> $500 is a bit much
>>> http://nixieshop.com/in-18-clock.html
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/dae1bc61-23ce-4600-9e70-f9c38b223ede%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to