I don't know anything about their lifetime issues. I can't find a single thread on Polish forums in which someone would complain about them. I have even found someone, who put LC-516 in his clock in 2007, and at time of posting in 2014 one of them had two digits shorted, but other than that they were still fine. Clock was working all time and was direct driven, no info about any cleansing routines. By the way: are Dolam tubes popular out of Poland? there aren't many of them on Ebay.
W dniu piątek, 17 marca 2017 19:10:38 UTC+1 użytkownik Paul Andrews napisał: > > They are nice lookinng clocks, BTW there is an option to select English as > the language on the web site. > > The LC-516 looks like a polish version of the IN-1. Does it have the same > issue with tube lifetime? i.e. does it also not include mercury to extend > the life of the tube? > > On Friday, March 17, 2017 at 12:14:11 PM UTC-4, Tomasz Kowalczyk wrote: >> >> Direct driven nixie clock don't have to be brighter. Many multiplexed >> ones are driven with higher pulse current - which is still acceptable >> according to datasheets (it was acceptable to drive nixies with half-wave >> rectified mains! Something that no one with brains would design today). It >> again comes to decision of constructor - better visibility or >> undercurrenting to increase life*. I personally have built only one clock, >> with Z566M tubes, which are in my opinion the most beautuful tubes - right >> proportions, high quality, curved digits and great thickness of gas coating >> around digits. I am multiplexing them at 4mA (datasheets suggest 4,5mA in >> direct drive) and digits are barely visible in strong sunlight - as spring >> is around the corner, I will probably adjust it to around 8-10mA, because >> more and more sun will come to my room :) >> *I am not sure if strong undercurrenting will increase tube life. I aim >> at point between lowest and average value in datasheet. >> >> Keith, I would suggest searching for top view tube clocks. They are >> generally cheaper, but in my opinion they look as good as side view tubes, >> they are less likely to be broken and these can actually look good with LED >> underlight (this is a phenomena I can't understand - in tube clock, the >> nixies should be the main thing that catches your eye). There is a small >> company in Poland, which creates beautiful clocks using Polish end view >> tubes: LC-513 and LC-516, which are (as far as I know) interchangeable with >> IN-1 and Z560M, respectively. These clocks can be purchased as finished >> products or as kits. >> >> http://www.electronixclock.pl/nasze-zegary/zegary-gotowe/electronixclock-4xlc516/ >> >> http://www.electronixclock.pl/nasze-zegary/zegary-gotowe/electronixclock-4xlc513/ >> Both cost about 125$ without shipping. >> Unfortunately, the site is in Polish only - but if you want, I can try to >> get them to contact with you. These clocks are well documented, as they are >> open source projects (again, documentation is avaible only on Polish forum >> elektroda.pl, I will find links and help to translate them if needed). >> If not those clocks, try searching for Z560M clocks - those are beautiful >> and cheap tubes (here in Poland about 2,5$ for used tube) >> >> >> W dniu czwartek, 16 marca 2017 15:34:05 UTC+1 użytkownik Paul Andrews >> napisał: >>> >>> I like the clocks from these guys: >>> http://www.ebay.com/usr/gra_and_afch_2?_trksid=p2053788.m1543.l2754 >>> They are direct drive so as bright as they can be. They come in various >>> forms, so you would probably want to make sure you at least bought one with >>> the arduino included. They have one with a case here: >>> >>> >>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/IN-14-NIXIE-Tubes-Clock-Musical-USB-RGB-Arduino-Divergence-Meter-GRA-AFCH-/162261613376?hash=item25c78bbb40:g:l2wAAOSwB09YFdZE >>> >>> On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 2:43:36 PM UTC-5, Keith wrote: >>>> >>>> I am wanting to purchase a nixie tube clock already built but I would >>>> like to get one that has the most brightness. I was looking at in-18 size >>>> nixie tubes. When looking at some the brightness is not that bright. So >>>> far >>>> I found this one to be a brightest unless it's just Photoshop or because >>>> the ambient lighting around it is darker. Does anyone have any >>>> recommendations for where to buy one that has a good reputation but does >>>> not cost an arm and a leg like this does? >>>> >>>> $500 is a bit much >>>> http://nixieshop.com/in-18-clock.html >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/70367f81-638b-4ba9-af54-a01b44a7f296%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
