Interesting. Anodes and cathodes are biased to 80V. Also, note that the 
segment drivers use current-limiting (emitter resistors).

On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 8:48:50 PM UTC-7 Richard Scales wrote:

> OK, I think I'm homing in on a solution.
>
> Assuming that I go with HV513 for high and low sides with the VPP's set 
> accordingly there is then the whole series resistor thing to work out as I 
> believe that peak currents can be higher in a multiplexed situation (did I 
> read that right?). The circuit that I have seen for the Bally Pinball 
> displays appear to be using a total of 1k5+1k2=2k7 though I have no 
> knowledge of the specification of the displays that they were using.
>
> For the ZM1500 displays I have here - the specification suggests anode 
> current between 0.4mA and 1.0mA with a maintaining voltage of 125V 
> (assuming that I translated that correctly). 
>
> Assuming a current of 0.5mA and a supply of 170V that suggests a series 
> resistor  of (170-125)/0.5 K  = 90K, a world apart from the values that 
> Bally are suggesting but I don't know their displays characteristics.
>
> Is there a suggestion that, depending on the 'on' time of the segment, the 
> actual current could be set higher?
>
> The same specification also lists an anode peak current of 10mA.
>
> For now I'll plan to use something like 90K on each cathode to see how 
> that goes - unless anyone can suggest that is hideously wrong?
>
> - Richard
>
> [image: Bally.JPG][image: ZM1500.JPG]
>
> On Tuesday, 25 May 2021 at 20:11:18 UTC+1 Paul Andrews wrote:
>
>> The HV513 is push/pull. You can use it for the anodes and the cathodes. 
>> You set Vpp to 170V for the HV513 you are using to control the anodes. You 
>> set Vpp to 80V for the HV513 you are using to control the cathodes. Each 
>> pin can source or sink 20mA. You could even chain them all together, as far 
>> as the SPI interface is concerned.
>>
>> You could use a resistor divider for the 80V, or you could use a zener 
>> voltage clamp. There should be next to no current flowing when the cathodes 
>> are at 80V (otherwise they would be lit).
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 1:25:44 AM UTC-4 Richard Scales wrote:
>>
>>> I think I am getting a little closer to understanding this all a little 
>>> bit more. I have almost grasped the concept of clamping the cathodes at an 
>>> intermediate voltage to aid switching them on and off in a timely manner in 
>>> an effort to minimise ghosting.
>>>
>>> Now it's all down to driver choice and chip count.
>>>
>>> How about HV5812's? i have seen these used in multiplexing circuits - 
>>> especially those where a group of say 6 nixies are split into two groups 
>>> then the 20 bits from the driver  are split into two groups of 10 bits, 
>>> each group for one set of three nixies. that works just fine for nixies, 
>>> not so good for a 16 digit device with cathodes common to all!
>>>
>>> Regardless, it would be slightly more efficient than using a 32 bit 
>>> device though ultimately an 8 bit device would suffice. Using the HV5812 I 
>>> can see that I can just connect Vpp to 80V, job done. If I wanted to use 
>>> HV513 (on the grounds that I only need 8 bits) would I then just clamp each 
>>> cathode to 80V via a suitable resistor?
>>>
>>> I guess I could simply not worry about it and waste the bits, I'm only 
>>> ever going to do this once or twice and one of my design goals is to make 
>>> this thing as small as possible.
>>>
>>> For the high side i definitely need to switch 16 anodes so I need to 
>>> employ a push/pull device - HV5523 will do that or I could perhaps use a 
>>> couple of HV513's - again, the easiest thing to do would be to use a single 
>>> HV5523 and waste half of the bits.
>>>
>>> In an effort to home in on a solution - a single HV5523 for the 16 
>>> anodes and a single HV5812 for the cathodes (clamped to 80V) - have I 
>>> missed anything crucial here?
>>>
>>> I just feel that I should get a handle on this multiplexing thing. I now 
>>> have a couple of different multi digit panaplex displays coming so I need 
>>> to come up with a plan.
>>>
>>> I have some ZM1500 (12 digits) on hand and some IGP-17 (16 digits) on 
>>> their way.
>>>
>>> ... and I've not even started to think about the timing of all the 
>>> various switching operations yet!
>>>
>>> Thank you all for helping me with my education 
>>>
>>> - Richard
>>>
>>> On Friday, 21 May 2021 at 19:13:35 UTC+1 nixiebunny wrote:
>>>
>>>> Richard,
>>>> A single push-pull HV driver chip will not be able to drive a 
>>>> multiplexed display. 
>>>>
>>>> The reason is that it only connects each tube element to either 0V or 
>>>> 180V. It is not capable of leaving an element disconnected.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 20, 2021, 8:45 PM Richard Scales <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I mean using the same type of device to control the anodes AND 
>>>>> the cathodes but but the actual same piece.
>>>>> So, using an HV5523 (or perhaps multiple HV513, multiple because there 
>>>>> are probably 8 cathodes (seven segment panaplex displays) and 16 Anodes 
>>>>> (16 
>>>>> digits)) could be a way forward then.
>>>>> Please could you let me know more about the need to clamp the cathodes 
>>>>> to a certain voltage? (Exposing my real lack of understanding here!)
>>>>> - Richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/1ac3102f-310e-4499-8a09-71a08fde73fbn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to