Could someone explain what the reforming involves ?

Thanks
Ian

> On 20 May 2022, at 06:12, SWISSNIXIE - Jonathan F. <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I've used a MAX1771 with ceramic capacitors a while ago for a 
> pandicon-circuit and a smaller nixie project. Both consume less than 
> 15mA@170V. Not sure how the circuit would behave at more current. 
> 
>> On Thursday, 19 May 2022 at 20:03:18 UTC+2 Dekatron42 wrote:
>> A few other things that I experienced at my previous employer was that 
>> larger (sizewise) MLCC capacitors easily developed cracks, came loose from 
>> the circuit board and also needed reforming after storage.
>> 
>> /Martin
>> 
>>> On Thursday, 19 May 2022 at 05:01:25 UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
>>> Roger,
>>> 
>>> Yes. Looks like the common dielectrics (X7T, X7R) available in the 250v 
>>> 1-3uf range suffer from a 30-80% reduction in capacitance at 180v. I hadn't 
>>> realized it was that high.
>>> Thank you, I'll look at the polymer caps. It's my last remaining 
>>> electrolytic on my board and if possible I would like to use a solid one 
>>> instead.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> -Moses
>>> 
>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 7:54:10 PM UTC-7 Roger Brinkman wrote:
>>>> Hi Moses,
>>>> 
>>>> What David writes below about the capacitance reduction of ceramic 
>>>> capacitors is correct. 
>>>> I have experienced success using polymer aluminium electrolytics (solid 
>>>> electrolyte) to replace conventional low-ESR electrolytic capacitors that 
>>>> regularly fail in similar applications. 
>>>> You might like to experiment with these. 
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards 
>>>> Roger Brinkman. 
>>>> 
>>>>>> On 19 May 2022, at 12:42 pm, David Forbes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> I haven't tried it, but I can make some observations. The MAX1771 isn't 
>>>>> connected directly to the output circuit, so it's not likely to suffer 
>>>>> from a problem. The current flows through the inductor which will 
>>>>> accommodate a momentary short circuit caused by the capacitor. 
>>>>> In short, it shouldn't be a problem.
>>>>> Bear in mind that the effective capacitance of a modern ceramic capacitor 
>>>>> is much lower with a DC bias near its rated voltage, so you would need to 
>>>>> use either capacitors rated for 5x the output voltage, or about 5x the 
>>>>> desired capacitance.
>>>>> Some capacitor data sheets publish this reduction in capacitance as a 
>>>>> function of bias voltage, most don't. Look for it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2022, 6:49 PM Moses <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Before I let the magic smoke out of half a dozen MAX1771 ICs.. has 
>>>>>> anyone ever tried using ceramic output capacitors? It wants a low ESR 
>>>>>> capacitor, so ceramics may work well.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The datasheet doesn't mention ceramics on the output side.. but then 
>>>>>> again it was written a few decades ago when the required 
>>>>>> voltage/capacitance probably was not readily available.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> -Moses
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7ae38dca-64ca-459d-a1e5-283a062f8f9en%40googlegroups.com.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to [email protected].
>>>> 
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAPbqtvcg0ak%2BLMH_7JJ01eFnYjFzu38v2N59k8ZfoFxrRY3J_g%40mail.gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bb141fcc-15ab-45de-a7ae-c9b38a3710dbn%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/22F362C4-0CFA-4825-BA2B-19C74B047A41%40yahoo.co.uk.

Reply via email to