On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:07:13 GMT, Michael McMahon <micha...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @Michael-Mc-Mahon, I'm fine with the change, though doesn't this obsolete >> the `by masking necessary amount of bytes` statement at the end? > > Sure, feel free to alter the suggestion. I really just wanted the original > point about "up to 3 remaining from the previous pass" bit retained. Fixed in 6d35f0b593e097a422b192be31deebed180c8290. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24033#discussion_r2009811619
