Wes Hardaker wrote:

1) I think we're close to resolution on the MinGW issue.  Here's my
   take:

   a) lack of compilation on a major architecture is something I'd
      like to fix if we can (I'm with Dave, I'm a unix bigot but I'm
      trying not to let that influence this message).  Thus, I'd be
      for the simple (.h only) MinGW patch iff [sic!] it doesn't break
      Cygwin and the normal MS compiler and we check this.

   b) if (a) then we MUST slip a week.  I agree with Dave that this is
      another one of those "shouldn't break anything" cases.  Note the
      "should" as opposed to "definitely won't".

2) the current vote, given my thinking that it should be done, is 4 in
   favor and 1 against.  I'm assuming that Andy is in favor here,
   though he didn't state that clearly that I could see (please do so
   or state another opinion).  That leaves us at +3 which means we
   should apply it.

3) The purpose of a democratic mechanism for determining what goes in
   is to ensure that if we screw up we have lots of people to blame.
   Spread the blame is my new motto ;-)  Thus, if this breaks then
   Dave will know just who to laugh at (4 of us, no less).

   Reasons for the new policy:

   a) it forces review.  We've just proved this is a good thing
      (Robert caught a bug before it got committed).

   b) We're getting bigger.  Thus we need to spread out the
      blame^H^H^H^H^Hresponsibility.

So, in light of the above and assuming things don't change:

1) tomorrow I'l push rc3 tomorrow with the patch assuming that:
   a) Andy responds saying he's for it and my guess above is right.
   b) someone tests MinGW (done), cygwin (Andy is doing this?) and the
      MS compiler (anyone???)

I have verified that the #ifndef WIN32 patch to interfaces.h does not affect the Win32 MSVC build. The config_require macro is not used in MSVC.



2) if the conditions in 1 are not met by tomorrow, I'll publish 5.2 instead.

[side note: next friday will be the final day of the IETF, which as we
all know is a historic time for me to publish a release while sitting
in the back of a meeting room ;-]

Alex



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to