>>>>> On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:02:12 +0000, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> I'd prefer to use:
Dave> disman/event -> new code
Dave> disman/old-event-mib -> old code
Dave> (with event-mib throwing an error)
Dave> a) It avoids silently moving someone from
Dave> the old code to the new code without warning.
Sometimes I think silence is good...
But Robert's complaint of not wanting to put exceptions in configure
is a good one. Thus if you want to do the above (to which I say
"sure, whatever, cause this is a minor issue in my mind") then I say
we adopt something like:
config_obsolete("Please use the new disman/event-mib module or the older
disman/old-event-mib if you still want to use the older implementation")
>> But, I'm a lone voice and not the implementer so I won't win ;-)
Dave> Don't worry, Wes. Being the implementer doesn't seem to make
Dave> a great deal of difference in this discussion :-(
Sure it does. It gives you 1.01 votes.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
