Dave Shield wrote:
I could live with issuing a warning about the change, but continuing
the configuration to use the new implementation anyway. That wouldn't
require touching anything, but would still alert people that things
had changed. Or alerting those who bother to read the messages, anyway.
That's probably the best compromise I can come up with.
Fine by me (and actually a *good* compromise, IMHO).
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
