On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:23:39 +0000 Dave wrote:
DS> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 11:10 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
DS> > So, to double-check, you're preferring to:
DS> > - keep "dist" in CVS MAIN only *and*
DS> > - do not ship "dist" with the source distribution?
DS>
DS> Yes - I think so. (but see below)
DS>
DS> > However, we will still need to ship some of the "dist" content
DS> > (net-snmp.spec, snmpd-init.d, snmptrapd-init.d) with e.g. source RPMs.
DS>
DS> Sure.
DS> So there might be a case for including those in the source tarball
DS> as well - I'm currently undecided. But we should probably try to
DS> keep the contents of this to a minimum.
Sounds reasonable to me, too.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
