>From Sun's discussion:
>> The "some consolidations need it for development" argument is not
>> sufficient for delivering it. We don't ship tokenize or cw despite
>> that fact that some consolidations most definitely require them.
>> Perhaps libtool in its current form really belongs in a package that
>> is not part of any consolidation's delivery (much as it currently is,
>> I believe).
>
>Hmmm.... I would very much like to see us eliminating obstacles to
>compiling and using OSS on Solaris. This was the motivating factor
>in the integration of gcc in Solaris 10, the movement of
>/usr/{sfw,ccs}/* to /usr, etc.
>How much open source software requires libtool, and doesn't provide
>it's own versions?
Do we provide our own version?
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
