Wes Hardaker wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:32:15 +0100, "Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> said: > > DS> I have a vague recollection of something similar arising in the > DS> past. > > And every time we fix it, we break it on some other set of opposite byte > swapped systems. > > Grr...
I'm not sure it's that bad anymore. We've restructured the code to allow for defines like #define UDP_ADDRESSES_IN_HOST_ORDER 1 in the include file for a particular platform. Dave, could you please add that to include/net-snmp/system/darwin9.h (in 5.4.x), rebuild on your OSX laptop and report back? Are there other occurrences of 1.0.0.127 and the like in a full snmpwalk output? 5.2.x doesn't really support OSX 10.5 because darin9.h is missing entirely. Is it worth adding it? +Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
