>>>>> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:28:31 -0400, Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> >>>>> said:
WH> 1) the last value set for that interface WH> 2) the super-cool string created from kernel info (from the patch) if possible WH> 3) an empty string RS> I'm not a big fan of this idea. If we pull data from the kernel, RS> then we should keep it in sync. Keeping our own value that doesn't RS> match feels wrong. If you read the object description, though, it really reads like an "snmp only object". We're just pre-populating it with helpful data... -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
