Den 19-06-2012 00:10, Wes Hardaker skrev: > Patch #1 is simple and just increases the shift variable allowing for 16 > bits of index values instead of the previous 8 (which wrapped >256 on > some systems).
I would like to see this also masking the index to make sure it does not overflow into the type part. > Patch #2 is a bit more complex and creates new integer based index API > for retrieving indexes and then ensure that they're < 2^SHIFT. If > they're greater than that, they're dropped as invalid indexes and the > data isn't reported (which is better than a crash). Any reason for adding the extra api? I would say this is a private api for snmpd, so we are free to change it > Please vote on both about whether they should be included into the > upcoming 5.5.2 and 5.6.2 releases. And 5.7 /Niels -- Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers --- R W Hamming ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
