Dave Shield <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk> writes: > I might question whether we need several copies of essentially the > same code in different files, but that may well be the safest way > forward - at least in the short term.
I started to look at that, but the problem is the third argument has various pointer types depending on the architecture in question. So I left it as individual routines. [I was also tempted to add a dummy 4th argument to the one architecture that only had 3 (hp, I think), but decided in the long run against it] -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
