Bill Fenner <[email protected]>:
> The configure script test can fail if you've regenerated it using autoconf
> but not using 2.68.
Running 2.69.
I never ran autoconf explicitly, just configure as per instructions.
> By "test 31" do you mean "snmpv1 traps are sent by snmpd API"?
Now I'm getting a different result, which is a little disturbing in itself:
com2sec directive (Wstat:
256 Tests: 31 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 30
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=76, Tests=327, 109 wallclock secs ( 0.28 usr 0.07 sys + 13.58 cusr 4.74
csys = 18.67 CPU)
Result: FAIL
We failed these 1 tests:
com2sec directive (
/home/esr/software/net-snmp-code/testing/fulltests/default/T070com2sec_simple )
> What branch did you use to run your tests?
master
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
