>From: Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Oct 11, 2006 8:25 AM >To: James Mckenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: NET SNMP List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Problems with Monitor > >On 11/10/06, James Mckenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You are correct with the monitor line, with the exception that I HAVE to >> specify a user >> using the -u parameter. > >Yes - that's a problem that I need to look at. > >> When I change the value of the result from either 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 no >> notification is sent. >> Do I need to specify a notification line as well? > >No - if you don't specify an event explicitly, it will default to >sending a notification. >But you *do* need a "trapsink" (or similar) entry, so that the agent >knows where to send it. > Got that line and it is to my network monitoring software system. > >> Also, there is a -i between the -r 60 and the first -o entry. Is this >> necessary? > >No - that's the (old) flag to indicate an "exact instance" entry. >Hence specifying extXxxx.1, extXxxx.2, etc
That is how my monitor line is set up right now. One monitor per instance. > >Without this flag, the one monitor entry will be applied to all >matching extResult instances >(with corresponding extName and extOutput indexes). > Is this fixed for Solaris? That is why it is there. I can remove it and see what happens. James McKenzie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
