> from that point of view, net.art, to me, has to be acurate in beauty and > meaning.
it's not net.art that has to be accurate in beauty and meaning, it's you, interacting with a work of net.art, or looking at a painting, that might be accurate in your relation to beauty and meaning. something is not beautiful or meaningful by essence, but potentially, in it's relation with people, with various approaches and perspectives. for example: http://www.datapainting.com/blaue-reiter/ this is full of beauty and meaning for me... and hopefully, not sure it's the same for you. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
