you're right art is not communication. But as cezanne said "I will tell you the truth in painting"
ken On Aug 15, 2007, at 10:38, ARN wrote: > >> I think I preferred the images to be honest. This I can't quite tell >> what it is meant to do. I can't help thinking it does not what it's >> meant to. > > why always looking for a meaning ? i'm not sure something should always > mean something (else than what it is, in reality). in fact, to be > honest > too, i believe in the contrary: a piece of art should not have a > determined meaning, so it remain open to high potential of > interpretations (for those looking for meaning). > art is not communication, despite the big current confusion. > > >> Like what was said about the images, can't there be more >> control over it? Instead of chars to link/click, a string to >> type/submit. ??? [slightly overwhelmed] ??? > > and.. why are you looking for more control ? > > http://www.x257.com/asrf/ seems not to be a tool allowing you to > produce > something you have the feeling to choose, it looks more like a simple > coded machine in the networked reality we share. > > >> it's too spammy. > > may be, that's a matter of style perception concerning machine outputs. > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
