3 more grrrrr's... marc > bloody hell - it was deleted it again yesterday immediately after i > reposted it! (luckily i saved it offline ...). they've also deleted the > UpStage page which i had redone (even tho it is my own project - but it > was recommended in the cyberformance deletion discussion & then no-one > seemed to be doing it so i did it) > > working out the deletion review process is giving me a headache - i'm > going to have to go out & hack some foliage for a while ... > > grrrrr ... > h : ( > > Rob Myers wrote: > >> Here is the discussion page for the original deletion - >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Furtherfield >> >> Here are the notability criteria for web sites - >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WEB >> >> We need to assemble examples of mentions of Furtherfield in web, media >> or literature and go for a deletion review - >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review >> >> The more impressive the tome or the site, the better. >> >> Bizarrely Wikipedia doesn't seem to have notability guidelines for arts >> organizations or galleries. I would argue that they should have de facto >> notability! >> >> I don't think I can edit the page (Wikipedia are strict about people not >> editing pages they actually know about^d^d are involved in), but we can >> assemble a good case here and then deliver it to the review. >> >> - Rob. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >> > > >
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
