Simon Biggs a probablement écrit :
> I agree, referencing Bruce Sterling can be annoying. 

could you explain why?


> It shouldn’t be
>  allowed (like citing Wikipedia).


...


is it ironic ?


> Simon Biggs Research Professor edinburgh college of art s.biggs@ eca
> .ac.uk www. eca .ac.uk www. eca .ac.uk/circle/
> 
> [email protected] www.littlepig.org.uk AIM/Skype: simonbiggsuk
> 
> 
> *From: *james morris <[email protected]> *Reply-To: *NetBehaviour for
> networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> 
> *Date: *Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:12:38 +0100 (BST) *To:
> *<[email protected]> *Subject: *Re: [NetBehaviour]
> Internet of Things....Research OpportunitiesonEPSRC funded Project]
> 
> 
> I did not mean to bash the project itself, and it did occur to me
> that the project might be subversive. Which was why I only selected
> the text that I did.
> 
> My main issue was the ridiculous suggestion that people using this
> new technology would suddenly be able to "find new uses for old
> things"... as if we had not been doing that for the past few
> millennia! As if monkeys don't do it with sticks! Etc. And then
> annoyance that whatever bruce sterling says is taken as word of god.
> 
> Did not want to bash the project itself, good luck with it.
> 
> James.
> 
> 
> On 25/6/2009, "Simon Biggs" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> The idea with the project Chris has introduced to the list is to
>> enable creative applications of this technology – particularly,
>> social scientists and artists’ use of social and geo-spatial
>> technologies. The intent is
> more
>> subversive than anything else and explicitly addresses issues of 
>> sustainability, a focus of the research and the institutions the
>> project members represent.
>> 
>> Note that Apple are already watching us all as red dots and have
>> been since the release of iPhone 3G. If you do not want to be
>> watched then dump the smart phone, the credit cards, your telecoms
>> subscriptions and never accept cookies from strangers (or anybody
>> else). Alternatively, function as a set of false identities
>> (although many legislatures are making this illegal). The
>> information in information technology always travels both ways.
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Simon
>> 
>> Simon Biggs Research Professor edinburgh college of art 
>> [email protected] www.eca.ac.uk www.eca.ac.uk/circle/
>> 
>> [email protected] www.littlepig.org.uk AIM/Skype: simonbiggsuk
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Pall Thayer <[email protected]> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for
>> networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> 
>> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:49:55 +0000 To: NetBehaviour for
>> networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> 
>> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Internet of Things....Research
>> Opportunities onEPSRC funded Project]
>> 
>> I don't usually worry much about surveillance. My life's more or
>> less an open book but this story scares me a bit. I can just
>> imagine a group of Apple employees, huddled around a bunch of
>> screens with a million red dots moving around on a Google map of
>> the world:
>> 
>> http://happywaffle.livejournal.com/5890.html
>> 
>> Pall
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:15 PM, james morris<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> shop, store and share products. The analogue bar code that has
>>>> for so long been a dumb encrypted reference to a shop’s
>>>> inventory
> system, will
>>>> be superseded by an open platform in which every object
>>>> manufactured will be able to be tracked from cradle to grave,
>>>> through manufacturer to distributor, to potentially every
>>>> single person who comes into contact
>>> 
>>> great! more surveillance!
>>> 
>>>> with it following its purchase. Further still, every object
>>>> that comes close to another object, and is within range of a
>>>> reader, could also be logged on a database and used to find
>>>> correlations between owners and applications. In a world that
>>>> has relied upon a linear chain of supply and demand between
>>>> manufacturer and consumer via high street shop, the Internet of
>>>> Things has the potential to transform how we will treat 
>>>> objects, care about their origin and use them to find other
>>>> objects. If every new object is within reach of a reader,
>>>> everything is searchable and findable, subsequently the
>>>> shopping experience may never be the
>>> 
>>> great! even more surveillance!
>>> 
>>>> same, and the concept of throwing away objects may become a
>>>> thing of the past as other people find new uses for old things.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Wow man, I'm glad all these technical boffins come up with such 
>>> fantastic ideas... Just a pity the Wombles[1] beat them to it.
>>> 
>>> [1] http://www.tidybag.co.uk/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour
>>> mailing list [email protected] 
>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- ***************************** Pall Thayer artist 
>> http://www.this.is/pallit *****************************
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour
>> mailing list [email protected] 
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> 
>> 
>> Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland,
>> 
> number SC009201
>> 




-- 
Yann Le Guennec
http://www.yannleguennec.com
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to