I tend to think that science produces knowledge about the world, but this 
knowledge is inherently abstract - string theory, for example, where 
mathesis becomes almost autonomous. Art relates directly to reception, to 
consciousness - the experience of negatively curved space for example. The 
boundaries are indeed blurred, but are there. The problem (and interest) 
for me lies with science and cosmology; the universe appears increasingly 
'alien' without the potential for modeling on a perceptual level: what 
does it mean to comprehend, say, our cosmos, if comprehension occurs only 
on the register of mathematical abstraction - and abstraction which may be 
inherently other (I'm thinking even of such things as the computer 
solution to the 4-color problem - issues of inelegance and ungainliness in 
physics/mathematics). - Alan



| Alan Sondheim Mail archive:  http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
| Webpage (directory) at http://www.alansondheim.org
| [email protected], [email protected], tel US 718-813-3285
! http://www.facebook.com/alan.sondheim

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to