> From: Michael Szpakowski <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:31:50 -0800 (PST)
> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Call for Submissions: Multichannel
> VariableEconomies Screening Programme Deadline 28th January (Helen Sloan)
> 
> Ah! I knew some of Marc's history but not yours Simon - this is fascinating
> and really helps to put into context some of the things you have argued here.
> There's nothing I'd disagree with here. It's often (well it is for me) nerve
> racking to post something more personal, especially when a lot of heat has
> been generated in a discussion, but I'm glad you have. regards michael ---
> On Sun, 1/10/10, Simon Biggs <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Simon Biggs
> <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Call for Submissions:
> Multichannel VariableEconomies Screening Programme Deadline 28th January
> (Helen Sloan) > To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
> <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 3:35 PM > >
> > Re: [NetBehaviour] Call for Submissions: > Multichannel VariableEconomies
> Screening Programme Deadline > 28th January (Helen Sloan) > >  > I am with >
> Marc on this, in more ways than one. > > > > I come from what could be
> considered a privileged > background, compared to what Marc describes. Mine
> was a > middle class academic family growing up on a beautiful wild > beach in
> Australia (as different from Southend on Sea as you > could get, except for
> the presence of the sea). However, > like Marc, I didn¹t school well. I ran
> away from home > at 15, living on communes and in surfer communities around >
> the country (this was the beginning of the 70¹s, so > that wasn¹t that unusual
> then). My parents, being > liberals, could not find any way of dealing with
> this. The > result was I never acquired a school or University > qualification
> and am effectively self-taught. > > > > Hippy life can burn you out. Too
> many drugs and too much > disorder eventually get to you. I went off to live
> on my > own, quietly, to concentrate on what I felt I could do well > ­
> painting. I was again lucky, as in my childhood the > family friends were
> mostly artists (my mother was a poet) so > I learned both technical knowledge
> from a young age and also > an appreciation of what the artist¹s life can be.
> It > was an easy thing for me to slip into being. I never went to > art
> college. So, it is strange for me that throughout my > professional life I
> have often found myself working in art > colleges and other academic
> environments. They are not alien > to me, as I grew up in a studious context,
> with books and > art. But it can be weird to teach when you can only imagine >
> what it is like to be a student. However, one advantage I > have is that I can
> argue, with conviction, that a degree is > not a pre-requisite to being an
> artist. I can describe > education as being about a personal journey into
> knowledge > and creativity, not a piece of paper that will eventually >
> validate you. My own experience can stand as evidence that > you do not need
> to fulfil other people¹s expectations > to achieve what you want. > > > >
> Education is the most effective force for social change I > have come across
> and it should be the right of every > individual to have as much of it as they
> want (or can > stand). Education can (should) be a primary resource for >
> transformation. It does not need to be formalised, but to > create substantial
> resource infrastructure you sometimes > need large institutions. When I argue
> the case for artists > working in academic environments I do so from a
> conviction > concerning education¹s transformative capacity, not > from some
> idea that everyone needs to be appropriately > validated. That validation is
> part of the problem with > education. > > > > Best > > > > Simon > > >
> > > > Simon Biggs > > > > Research Professor > > edinburgh college of
> art > > [email protected] > > www.eca.ac.uk > > > > Creative
> Interdisciplinary Research into CoLlaborative Environments > > CIRCLE
> research group > > www.eca.ac.uk/circle/ > > > > [email protected] >
> > www.littlepig.org.uk > > AIM/Skype: simonbiggsuk > > > > > > From:
> marc > garrett <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: NetBehaviour for
> networked distributed > creativity <[email protected]> > > Date:
> Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:44:25 +0000 > > To: NetBehaviour for networked
> distributed > creativity <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re:
> [NetBehaviour] Call for Submissions: > Multichannel VariableEconomies
> Screening Programme Deadline > 28th January (Helen Sloan) > > > > Hi Curt &
> all, > > > > As someone who mainly comes from a self-education position, >
> or rather > > from a place where I come from a very poor and violent >
> working class > > family - which spent most of the time either being put
> in > social care, > > whether this be in borstals and prison, plus family
> members > vanishing > > because of the failures of 70's social (un)care >
> systems. Just think of > > 'Cathy Come Home' by Ken Loach - > >
> http://en.wikipediaorg/wiki/Cathy_Come_Home > and may get some idea of my >
> > own personal history. Moving on from that I wish to mention > that, for me
> > > education is one of the most important aspects of human > development
> and > > a human right. > > > > Because I was not fortunate when younger
> to be able to > experience a > > decent education, I had to discover various
> sneaky ways in > finding > > information that the terrible school I was at,
> was not > teaching me. My > > passion to discover what was going in the
> world beyond the > chaos of my > > everyday circumstance was strong - even
> obsessed, whether > it was in > > science, politics, technology, history,
> philosophy or art, > I would bunk > > school regularly and spend an awful
> lot of my time in the > Essex Library, > > which thankfully was in
> Southend-on-Sea, a town 50 miles > from London. > > Some examples of what I
> read from the age of 12 and 13 and > (of course) > > onwards, were books
> such as the The Mass Psychology of > Fascism by > > Wilhelm Reich, The
> Divided Self by R. D. Laing, James > Joyce, T. S. Eliot > > and D. H.
> Lawrence. Carl Jung, Fear of Flying by Erica > Jong, Herbert > > Read -
> especially Education Through Art and The Paradox of > Anarchism, > > loads
> of art books. I am not saying that I understood these > > > publications,
> but I am saying that it encouraged me to > learn more and I > > have not
> stopped since. > > > > So, when I think of education I do not immediately
> think of > official > > education as in universities or colleges. For I am a
> strong > advocate of > > self-education, which also involves one being self
> critical > as well. > > There is larger and broader context where
> individuals have > the choice to > > explore life, art and all the other
> equally important > subjects outside > > institution environments as well.
> One of my personal > worries in respect > > of UK culture, which may be also
> the same regarding USA, > although > > influenced through different
> historical, political > situations is that, > > my own class - as in,
> working class has turned into a mass > of gibbering > > X Factor driven
> bimbos. Of course, this is not a universal > issue, but > > the consumer
> orientated mediation of our cultures via neo > liberal > > agendas have not
> helped. > > > > I personally do not think that individuals themselves >
> should deny any > > official forms of education. For there are some good >
> educators here and > > there who are decent and authentic in appreciating
> how to > learn > > themselves, and are active in the process of engaging
> with > students in > > ways that attempt in spirit, to transcend beyond the
> bland > and > > over-efficient trappings of slack management structures >
> that manner are > > dealing with. Not just this, economics is factor in
> the > real world and > > gaining degrees and learning via institutional
> means gets > you a job. > >  From that, if you are artist you get some
> proper > money to fund your own > > projects on your own terms etc... > >
> > > The irony of learning outside of my school environment at > that age was
> > > that, at 14 I was asked to go to college at weekends by the > Essex >
> > council. Which was strange because all the other students > were on > >
> average 17-20 years of age. I was told to go back to school > or they > >
> would put me in a Borstal, so I did in the end. > > > >  From this
> experience ideas around education have also > been informed by > > writers
> such as 'Deschooling Society' by Ivan > Illich, and other works > > such
> "Pedagogy of the Oppressed' by Paulo Friere. > Yet, in contrast to > > all
> of this art (whatever medium) as a from of creative > expression has > >
> always been my main agenda and always will be :-) > > > > wishing you
> well. > > > > marc > > > Hi Rob (and all), > > > > > > Fun quotes (for
> the prose alone). Yes. stones, glass > houses, logs in > > > eyes and specks
> in eyes. The following quote is from > the > > > acknowledgements of Rita
> Raley's 2009 > "Tactical Media" book (which I > > > will teach this semester
> in a freshman "liberal > studies introductory > > > colloquium" course
> called "Tactical Media / > D.I.Y. Anarchy"): > > > > > > "It is my fervent
> wish that this book will become > obsolete becaues > > > the world will have
> changed so dramatically that this > study of > > > art-activism could only
> appar as a quaint historical > artifact, its > > > latent pessimism
> misguided, its failure to imagine > otherwise > > > indicative of the
> author's poverty of imagination. > Until such a > > > point, I will continue
> to look to tactical media > artists for > > > inspiration and guidance."
> (xii) > > > > > > Not that I myself look to "tactical media > artists" for
> much > > > inspiration or guidance, and probably by the end of > the course
> we > > > will have critiqued their approaches from > contradictory
> perspectives > > > -- the work is too didactic/hamfisted/pragmatic; the >
> work is too > > > disengaged/esoteric/impotent. (Throw a critical stone > in
> the air and > > > you will hit a tactical media artist.) > > > > > > It is
> always amusing to me when artists and/or > educators try to > > >
> out-ethicalize each other, as if any of us are all > that directly, > > >
> pragmatically, quantitatively, measurably changing > anything. For me, > > >
> art and teaching are a gamble -- a gamble that some > kind of abstract > > >
> affective agency will eventually modulate actual > aspects of the world > >
> > in some way that will "matter." > Consequently, I admire others who are >
> > > making similar wagers. But I don't ever fool > myself into believing >
> > > that I'm on the street feeding the poor. Because > I've done that kind >
> > > of work as well, and it's quite a different > thing. > > > > > > Rock &
> Roll Ain't No Pollution, > > > Curt > > > > > > > > > > > >    > > >>
> There's more irony to be had in the quotes, > that's why I posted them. > >
> >> That and, as Michael points out, they are funny. > > >> > > >> Art &
> Language are anti-academic but started > and have often ended up in > > >>
> academia. They are politically committed but show > at a gentrifying, > > >>
> market-leading gallery. Despite protests to the > contrary they are > > >>
> radical artists who have artworld careers. I like > them. > > >> > > >> It's
> very easy to criticise academia, artistic > careerism, the art > > >> market,
> politically/socially committed art etc. > from the security of > > >> one's
> own, virtuous, position outside of them. > But there's no point > > >>
> outside the world where we can stand and point and > laugh at it. > > >> > >
> >> We all need to be careful about glass houses, or > at least work on > > >>
> smashing our own windows, whether our teaching > means we are objectively > >
> >> in academia or our radical socially committed > artistic practice means
> we > > >> are objectively part of gentrification. > > >> > > >> The most
> important criticism is self-criticism, > although this may > > >> sometimes
> mean that we have to admit we are not > criticising others > > >> enough. ;-)
> I've taught, I've wired up > abandoned warehouses, I've > > >> attended
> private views, I write reviews for a > techno-art-and-society web > > >>
> community. We are all guilty... > > >> > > >> - Rob. > > >>
> _______________________________________________ > > >> NetBehaviour mailing
> list > > >> [email protected] > > >>
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > >>      > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > NetBehaviour
> mailing list > > > [email protected] > > >
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > > > > >    >
> > > > _______________________________________________ > > NetBehaviour
> mailing list > > [email protected] > >
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > > > > > >
> > Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered > in Scotland,
> number SC009201 > > > > > >  > > > > > -----Inline Attachment
> Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ >
> NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] >
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour ____________________
> ___________________________ NetBehaviour mailing
> list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinf
> o/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to