Hi Marc

Thanks, your comments wrap it up well. Right now I am up to my ears in the
down-side of academia, dealing with course development, associated
bureaucracy, institutional politics and ridiculous deadlines. My reply is
therefore very short.

Best

Simon


Simon Biggs

Research Professor
edinburgh college of art
[email protected]
www.eca.ac.uk

Creative Interdisciplinary Research into CoLlaborative Environments
CIRCLE research group
www.eca.ac.uk/circle/

[email protected]
www.littlepig.org.uk
AIM/Skype: simonbiggsuk



From: marc garrett <[email protected]>
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:38:24 +0000
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Call for Submissions: Multichannel
VariableEconomies Screening Programme Deadline 28th January (Helen Sloan)

Hi Simon, Just catching up, Good to read a contextual and historical side
about you. I find it fascinating how people's creative ventures are
influenced by their past experiences, and how this can produce unique
selves, that (thankfully) define our differences, whether our accumalted
influences are formal, not formal or both. I have always been drawn to those
who think differently - as in, not fitting into mainstream behaviours - I
suppose engaging in art or related contexts is an inevitable place or space
to exist in. Finding alternative ways to think and different paths to
wander, this brings about valuable resources for self-learning. And how we
manage to incorporate this 'stuff', nourish our imagination(s) is part of a
never ending struggle. I also think it's equally interesting that, even
though we need things which stimulate us, or at least encourage us to make
and explore creative and imaginative territories. We also need the bland
other, the backgorund where our art and related activities and ideas rests
upon or against - a contrast which in some way is different from the
everyday, even when art blurs it is still separate due to the relational
aspects and intentions behind creating such things. Life can be a meme, but
can art be meme non-intentionally? wishing you well. marc I am with Marc on
this, in more ways than one. I come from what could be considered a
privileged background, compared to what Marc describes. Mine was a middle
class academic family growing up on a beautiful wild beach in Australia (as
different from Southend on Sea as you could get, except for the presence of
the sea). However, like Marc, I didn¹t school well. I ran away from home at
15, living on communes and in surfer communities around the country (this
was the beginning of the 70¹s, so that wasn¹t that unusual then). My
parents, being liberals, could not find any way of dealing with this. The
result was I never acquired a school or University qualification and am
effectively self-taught. Hippy life can burn you out. Too many drugs and too
much disorder eventually get to you. I went off to live on my own, quietly,
to concentrate on what I felt I could do well ­ painting. I was again lucky,
as in my childhood the family friends were mostly artists (my mother was a
poet) so I learned both technical knowledge from a young age and also an
appreciation of what the artist¹s life can be. It was an easy thing for me
to slip into being. I never went to art college. So, it is strange for me
that throughout my professional life I have often found myself working in
art colleges and other academic environments. They are not alien to me, as I
grew up in a studious context, with books and art. But it can be weird to
teach when you can only imagine what it is like to be a student. However,
one advantage I have is that I can argue, with conviction, that a degree is
not a pre-requisite to being an artist. I can describe education as being
about a personal journey into knowledge and creativity, not a piece of paper
that will eventually validate you. My own experience can stand as evidence
that you do not need to fulfil other people¹s expectations to achieve what
you want. Education is the most effective force for social change I have
come across and it should be the right of every individual to have as much
of it as they want (or can stand). Education can (should) be a primary
resource for transformation. It does not need to be formalised, but to
create substantial resource infrastructure you sometimes need large
institutions. When I argue the case for artists working in academic
environments I do so from a conviction concerning education¹s transformative
capacity, not from some idea that everyone needs to be appropriately
validated. That validation is part of the problem with education. Best Simon
Simon Biggs Research Professor edinburgh college of art s.biggs@ eca .ac.uk
www. eca .ac.uk C reative I nterdisciplinary R esearch into C o L laborative
E nvironments CIRCLE research group www. eca .ac.uk/circle/
[email protected] www.littlepig.org.uk AIM/Skype: simonbiggsuk From:
marc garrett <[email protected]> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for
networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> Date: Sun,
10 Jan 2010 14:44:25 +0000 To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed
creativity <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Call
for Submissions: Multichannel VariableEconomies Screening Programme Deadline
28th January (Helen Sloan) Hi Curt & all, As someone who mainly comes from a
self-education position, or rather from a place where I come from a very
poor and violent working class family - which spent most of the time either
being put in social care, whether this be in borstals and prison, plus
family members vanishing because of the failures of 70's social (un)care
systems. Just think of 'Cathy Come Home' by Ken Loach -
http://en.wikipediaorg/wiki/Cathy_Come_Home and may get some idea of my own
personal history. Moving on from that I wish to mention that, for me
education is one of the most important aspects of human development and a
human right. Because I was not fortunate when younger to be able to
experience a decent education, I had to discover various sneaky ways in
finding information that the terrible school I was at, was not teaching me.
My passion to discover what was going in the world beyond the chaos of my
everyday circumstance was strong - even obsessed, whether it was in science,
politics, technology, history, philosophy or art, I would bunk school
regularly and spend an awful lot of my time in the Essex Library, which
thankfully was in Southend-on-Sea, a town 50 miles from London. Some
examples of what I read from the age of 12 and 13 and (of course) onwards,
were books such as the The Mass Psychology of Fascism by Wilhelm Reich, The
Divided Self by R. D. Laing, James Joyce, T. S. Eliot and D. H. Lawrence.
Carl Jung, Fear of Flying by Erica Jong, Herbert Read - especially Education
Through Art and The Paradox of Anarchism, loads of art books. I am not
saying that I understood these publications, but I am saying that it
encouraged me to learn more and I have not stopped since. So, when I think
of education I do not immediately think of official education as in
universities or colleges. For I am a strong advocate of self-education,
which also involves one being self critical as well. There is larger and
broader context where individuals have the choice to explore life, art and
all the other equally important subjects outside institution environments as
well. One of my personal worries in respect of UK culture, which may be also
the same regarding USA, although influenced through different historical,
political situations is that, my own class - as in, working class has turned
into a mass of gibbering X Factor driven bimbos. Of course, this is not a
universal issue, but the consumer orientated mediation of our cultures via
neo liberal agendas have not helped. I personally do not think that
individuals themselves should deny any official forms of education. For
there are some good educators here and there who are decent and authentic in
appreciating how to learn themselves, and are active in the process of
engaging with students in ways that attempt in spirit, to transcend beyond
the bland and over-efficient trappings of slack management structures that
manner are dealing with. Not just this, economics is factor in the real
world and gaining degrees and learning via institutional means gets you a
job. From that, if you are artist you get some proper money to fund your own
projects on your own terms etc... The irony of learning outside of my school
environment at that age was that, at 14 I was asked to go to college at
weekends by the Essex council. Which was strange because all the other
students were on average 17-20 years of age. I was told to go back to school
or they would put me in a Borstal, so I did in the end.  From this
experience ideas around education have also been informed by writers such as
'Deschooling Society' by Ivan Illich, and other works such "Pedagogy of the
Oppressed' by Paulo Friere. Yet, in contrast to all of this art (whatever
medium) as a from of creative expression has always been my main agenda and
always will be :-) wishing you well. marc > Hi Rob (and all), > > Fun quotes
(for the prose alone). Yes. stones, glass houses, logs in > eyes and specks
in eyes. The following quote is from the > acknowledgements of Rita Raley's
2009 "Tactical Media" book (which I > will teach this semester in a freshman
"liberal studies introductory > colloquium" course called "Tactical Media /
D.I.Y. Anarchy"): > > "It is my fervent wish that this book will become
obsolete becaues > the world will have changed so dramatically that this
study of > art-activism could only appar as a quaint historical artifact,
its > latent pessimism misguided, its failure to imagine otherwise >
indicative of the author's poverty of imagination. Until such a > point, I
will continue to look to tactical media artists for > inspiration and
guidance." (xii) > > Not that I myself look to "tactical media artists" for
much > inspiration or guidance, and probably by the end of the course we >
will have critiqued their approaches from contradictory perspectives > --
the work is too didactic/hamfisted/pragmatic; the work is too >
disengaged/esoteric/impotent. (Throw a critical stone in the air and > you
will hit a tactical media artist.) > > It is always amusing to me when
artists and/or educators try to > out-ethicalize each other, as if any of us
are all that directly, > pragmatically, quantitatively, measurably changing
anything. For me, > art and teaching are a gamble -- a gamble that some kind
of abstract > affective agency will eventually modulate actual aspects of
the world > in some way that will "matter." Consequently, I admire others
who are > making similar wagers. But I don't ever fool myself into believing
> that I'm on the street feeding the poor. Because I've done that kind > of
work as well, and it's quite a different thing. > > Rock & Roll Ain't No
Pollution, > Curt > > > >    >> There's more irony to be had in the quotes,
that's why I posted them. >> That and, as Michael points out, they are
funny. >> >> Art & Language are anti-academic but started and have often
ended up in >> academia. They are politically committed but show at a
gentrifying, >> market-leading gallery. Despite protests to the contrary
they are >> radical artists who have artworld careers. I like them. >> >>
It's very easy to criticise academia, artistic careerism, the art >> market,
politically/socially committed art etc. from the security of >> one's own,
virtuous, position outside of them. But there's no point >> outside the
world where we can stand and point and laugh at it. >> >> We all need to be
careful about glass houses, or at least work on >> smashing our own windows,
whether our teaching means we are objectively >> in academia or our radical
socially committed artistic practice means we >> are objectively part of
gentrification. >> >> The most important criticism is self-criticism,
although this may >> sometimes mean that we have to admit we are not
criticising others >> enough. ;-) I've taught, I've wired up abandoned
warehouses, I've >> attended private views, I write reviews for a
techno-art-and-society web >> community. We are all guilty... >> >> - Rob.
>> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing
list >> [email protected] >>
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>      > >
_______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected] >
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > >
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour Edinburgh College
of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC009201
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, number 
SC009201


_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to