Thanks a lot Rob for your thoughts.
They are precious

Annie

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:

> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:04 PM, anniea <[email protected]> wrote:
> > (ENG)* Collaboration* on and via the Internet has been a hot topic for
> > some time. Now everyone tends to see the Net more as a space for
> > conservative individual self-representation and mediation. I wonder
> about
> > this. What makes it so difficult? Why doesn’t, does it work? Why are
> > people
> > less interested?>>
> >> Any thoughts on this from you netbehaviourists?
> >> If yes, thanks a lot in advance!
>
> There's more collaboration than ever before, but it's with Facebook and
> Twitter rather than with other human beings. This looks more socialised
> than web 1.0 because the machinery is hidden behind a slick veneer. But so
> are the people...
>
> The barriers to entry of the old email-and-homepages net art era are easy
> to paint as having been more exclusive than web 2.0's easy sign-up. This
> doesn't explain why there's less collaboration, though, you'd think it
> should be the opposite.
>
> I think that having to be able to deal with *people* enough to find out
> how to code html, get some space on a server, and ftp a file or set up an
> email client, or locate a mailing list and subscribe, was more socialising
> than just having Facebook template up the same information about you as
> about everyone else. You had to be able to find and communicate with
> *people* who knew about the technology, and you this led to a shared body
> of technical and social experience. Having tasks that everyone had to do
> meant that everyone had to start out by collaborate on them. With that
> intital collaboration established, you could continue from there.
>
> Second Life is an interesting halfway house between web 1.0 / web 2.0.
> It's reasonably simple to log in as a porn-star-look-alike, but much harder
> to build things. Eventually a Facebook-style sausage machine will emerge
> that means you don't have to struggle productively with the medium, you can
> just be cool like everyone else instantly. And the people who use it will
> laugh at the old prim hackers and their ignorant, restrictive ways.
>
> Web 2.0 is a race to the bottom for individualism. Everyone is expressing
> their recognisably individual selves (sic) in a global context. The
> pressure to conform is much greater than just for an immediate social group
> (even where that is the limit of someone's personal Facebook interaction).
> When the pressure to conform requires that you choose reified, consumable
> signifiers of "individuality", or even that you package any actual
> individuality into an anti-individualistic presentational schema, it
> becomes much harder to laugh like all the other cool kids at the twinkly
> star backgrounds on old homepages. At least there were figure and ground
> relations then. There aren't any on Facebook.
>
> There's not enough distance between technology and society any more for
> art computing or net art to continue as before, therefore there are not the
> tasks to collaborate on. We need to move from collapsing that distance to
> recreating it, or to problematising the closeness, or to finding a new
> distance where it now exists. We'll need to collaborate on that.
>
> - Rob.
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>



-- 
Lundi 25 janvier :  On Collaboration I, séance de travail à Kawenga
Montpellier avec Simon Benhamou (chercheur en écologie comportementale),
Mathias Beyler ( metteur en scène ), Laurent Marseault (expert en outils de
collaboration sur le web), Thierry Serdane (chercheur en science info com)
et Elisabeth Rolland-Thiers ( doctorante en psychologie cognitive
expérimentale ) http://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2010/01/10/on-collaboration1/

On Collaboration : http://bram.org/collaboration/index.php
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to