...Gilbert & George are artists whose 'golden time' was at the end of 
60-ies...and...so on... until recent time...meanwhile art became something 
meta-aesthetic...one part's ''Foundation art'' who was paid from sponsors 
who want to see how particular 'art' problem could influence in some 
specific society/for example in society in transition/...some foundations 
like 'ProHelvetia' , 'Soros open society fond'...etc...trough form of 
'social research','workshops' and similar ideologematic activism try to 
establish kind of culture close to one which they thing it's proper for 
that/particular/society...artist as indivudal,Subject of his own art became 
mouse in one great laboratory caled''Foundation Art''...for they 
*work*those,so called 'artist' get some $ depend from which country they 
are/maybe you cold remember few Bulgarian artist who were popular during the 
90-ies/at least in Balcan/...now we can't even remember their names...one of 
them claim that ''he is best artist in Bulgaria because he 'make' more than 
100 000$ from different foundation with his participation in some regional 
exhibitions''/that's also art,oh,yes!/...now he hardly can remember his own 
name...he do his job,Bulgaria became part of EU and nobody need his art 
anymore...more interesting's case with ''Corporation Art''...Marina 
Abramovic was interesting artist who start carrier in Belgrade during late 
60-ies...every sense that time she was good performing artist but she/in her 
word:'spend much more time siting on the phone and collecting money than 
working art'...all that's chan'ge in one exhibition in Sarajevo in mid 
90-ies during the civil war in former Yugoslavia..she give her work and her 
carrier from one of good/even very good/example of 'Foundation Art' became 
part of ''Corporation art''...it's not so hard to make that small 
step...just give up from your people and take another flag...but it wasn't 
act of leaving her art,or make it better...i find her work in last two 
decade interesting in one level-it's very fanny...i mean realy funny in 
sense i laugh when i look at her work...it's still art..of course...why 
not...but who is going to show pain,solitude,desperate/?/...i'm sure Marina 
is not the one...
so...Gilbert & George are Buddhas of ''Corporation Art'' same as 
Damien,Hockney,...name them...of course there's people who still believe in 
art but it's better for them to change name of their work...instead 'art' 
they could name that as 'techne'...it's not important to make REVOLUTION on 
the first place...for beginning it's good to make revolution in language of 
revolution/you could replace word 'revolution' with word 
'art'/techne/...MANIK...MARCH...2012...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "marc garrett" <[email protected]>
To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Read this about Gilbert & George in the Evening 
Standard yesterday


Hi Dave,

Why anyone would listen to or even give their opinions any weight is
beyond me.

I think it's obvious that G&G are elitists, and would not wish to lose
any income from their bourgeois client base.

They are on the side of the exploiters - it's good business sense as far
as they are concerned.

Who gives a shit whether they work from 5. am or not - many work just as
hard for much less, and are losing their jobs, communities, and much
more - they are not relevant.

wishing you well.

marc
> http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/arts/visual-arts/wed-rather-side-with-the-bankers-than-some-vegan-protester-twit-on-benefits-say-gilbert-and-george-7537242.html
> "By the mid-Seventies they were already a fully fledged double-act.
> Sexually libertarian, revolutionary even, they have always been
> politically conservative and are harsh judges of those who do not
> share their work ethic. They both dismiss the St Paul’s protesters as
> “hippies” and “idiots” and would rather side with the bankers than
> “some vegan twit on benefits”, they think Boris Johnson is “a
> wonderful modern person” and believe fiercely in “making money”.
> “We make our art, we try to sell it. We are doing it day and night, we
> are here at 5am trying to do it every day for the last 40 years.
> That’s fantastic, no?” says Gilbert."
>
>
> I think ... If their work is supposed to be some sort of comment on
> the world around them, then it's very surface/ un - informed. They
> live a stone's throw from The City and yet appear to be completely
> oblivious - and disinterested - in what's going on.
>
> dave
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>


-- 
Other Info:

Furtherfield - A living, breathing, thriving network
http://www.furtherfield.org - for art, technology and social change since 
1997

Also - Furtherfield Gallery&  Social Space:
http://www.furtherfield.org/gallery

About Furtherfield:
http://www.furtherfield.org/content/about

Netbehaviour - Networked Artists List Community.
http://www.netbehaviour.org

http://identi.ca/furtherfield
http://twitter.com/furtherfield

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour 

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to