----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Myers" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:01 PM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Read this about Gilbert & George in the Evening Standard yesterday
On 06/03/12 22:41, manik wrote: > > so...Gilbert & George are Buddhas of ''Corporation Art'' same as I love this description. -Nice gentlemans:) > Damien,Hockney,...name them...of course there's people who still believe > in > art but it's better for them to change name of their work...instead 'art' > they could name that as 'techne'...it's not important to make REVOLUTION > on > the first place...for beginning it's good to make revolution in language > of > revolution/you could replace word 'revolution' with word > 'art'/techne/...MANIK...MARCH...2012... I think it's not so important to name what you are doing as you do it. The name may be a limit. -How can we wrote novel without words?In my new novel all other novels are pure,white paper.But my own novel is full of words!Contradictio in adjecto:) But I dp cling to "art", although I doubt many people would regard much of what I do or like as art. :-) -We find that question is about goes on the other side.Sometime like that,sometime like That.Same as Andy get Nole last time,but next time..hm...life's short and sensless.And tragic ...too... - Rob. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
