I had this whole thing thought out about the necessary time signature of a voxel. The pixel doesn't have a time signature but it has a place signature. If we alter the timing of a voxel, we end up with nonsense (but its locations doesn't matter). Likewise, if we alter the placement of a pixel, we end up with nonsense (but its timing doesn't matter). So the voxel is without place and the pixel is without time?
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:11 PM, mez breeze <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Pall Thayer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I chose the pixel for a reason. It's not time based. A voxel will be it's >> progressive value over time. Perhaps the reason for "cubed"? >> > > Indeedily. > > >> I'm not sure. Regardless. A voxel will be a series of whatever... a pixel >> need not be a pixel. No? >> > > No [meaning yes;)] > > Cheekily, > Mez > > > -- > | facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign <http://www.facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign> > | twitter.com/MezBreezeDesign > | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mez_Breeze > > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > -- ***************************** Pall Thayer artist http://pallthayer.dyndns.org *****************************
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
