If you detemporalize the voxel, I'll displace the pixel.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Pall Thayer <[email protected]> wrote: > I had this whole thing thought out about the necessary time signature of a > voxel. The pixel doesn't have a time signature but it has a place > signature. If we alter the timing of a voxel, we end up with nonsense (but > its locations doesn't matter). Likewise, if we alter the placement of a > pixel, we end up with nonsense (but its timing doesn't matter). So the > voxel is without place and the pixel is without time? > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:11 PM, mez breeze <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Pall Thayer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I chose the pixel for a reason. It's not time based. A voxel will be >>> it's progressive value over time. Perhaps the reason for "cubed"? >>> >> >> Indeedily. >> >> >>> I'm not sure. Regardless. A voxel will be a series of whatever... a >>> pixel need not be a pixel. No? >>> >> >> No [meaning yes;)] >> >> Cheekily, >> Mez >> >> >> -- >> | facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign <http://www.facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign> >> | twitter.com/MezBreezeDesign >> | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mez_Breeze >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >> > > > > -- > ***************************** > Pall Thayer > artist > http://pallthayer.dyndns.org > ***************************** > -- ***************************** Pall Thayer artist http://pallthayer.dyndns.org *****************************
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
