i am using a mac, you had said it didn't work for macs but i tried anyway
and love the bot's little flight-paths, like butterflies- maybe i'll make
something with those :)

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Bjørn Magnhildøen <[email protected]>
wrote:

> and i guess you have tried to draw also? sorry, it might not work
> cross-browser this, thanks for trying
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Mab MacMoragh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> i can't enter any text but the responses are nice
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Bjørn Magnhildøen <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> "what it does when it does what it's supposed to do" :)
>>>
>>> indeed, that's just about it.
>>>
>>> i mean, an open semantic form, would be, given the loop in your
>>> statement, where 'meaning' comes in, biting its tail.
>>> is meaning a loop? or is it open? is it a warm chewing away the dirt
>>> around itself? what about the gestures of the creature, do they have any
>>> meaning?
>>> alphabetic language might be likened to military commands, pitched
>>> rational and effective, building or destroying empires.
>>> beneath that are gestures, body, domains without handles, all kinds of,
>>> call them languages, since we're biological and anything we do is language
>>> as opposed to say random quantum events. it would be really hard for us to
>>> do something 'random' which wouldn't link up to our specific phenomenology.
>>> this, only to say that an 'open semantic form' is just a looser form of
>>> meaning-production, deliberately avoiding the ... and try establishing a
>>> poetical - the word - notion of ... not that 'poetical' is at stake, but
>>> how would a feral child communicate, given its history? can we imagine
>>> other types of languages, less formal,more intuitive than sign and glyph.
>>> so there's asemic writing, for humans, or for cats and dogs. enter the
>>> ouroboros, when does it have meaning, when does the semantic form bite its
>>> tail? to be sure, we do not know even that it's a language. does it
>>> decode?does it have to decode? ah, much we want to decode... the
>>> mysteries...if only to stage them again as theater, doubled form and double
>>> negation. the 'O' stands untouched.  i'm writing in your hand instead.
>>>
>>> the use i imagined of the asemic chat is like this chat log
>>> http://noemata.net/chatasemic/chat/1426628136.html
>>> where several humans, or reloads of, are chatting, with a bot on the
>>> side.
>>>
>>> but you see there are others like this
>>> http://noemata.net/chatasemic/chat/1426706990.html
>>> where one part is mute, only the bot is gesturing wildly, so we can
>>> imagine the human is actively imagining what it's saying.
>>>
>>> then i like this one also
>>> http://noemata.net/chatasemic/chat/1426624996.html
>>> which is a reframing of language+
>>>
>>> i don't know if this answered your question.i thoughtof a primitive
>>> gestural communication, somehow in an absurd chat-form,questioning language
>>> and what we do with it. how could it not be social? keeping it simple (and
>>> stupid), there's some reflective space there, the context is already full,
>>> we arefull, so often we don't need much to catalyst. lot of text is used to
>>> prop up holes in the wall ... anyway, at some level there's a bridge
>>> between language and art, or state your own river.
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for response, appreciated
>>>
>>> bjørn
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:34 PM, ruth catlow <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Thanks for posting : )
>>>>
>>>> It does something on Firefox for linux - I type, it scrawls (rather
>>>> charmingly, like a human who doesn't care that I can't read its
>>>> handwriting).
>>>>
>>>> but what it does, doesn't tell me what "A wordless open semantic form
>>>> of social interaction between humans and bot"
>>>> what do the words 'semantic' and 'social' mean.
>>>>
>>>> please could you say more about what it does when it does what it's
>>>> supposed to do?
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> Ruth
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On 17/03/15 18:47, Bjørn Magnhildøen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> i get some response it's not working on mac, not sure if safari has
>>>> complete html5 canvas drawing support... haven't cross-checked on
>>>> browsers.... still, empty dialogues create visuals...
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Alan Sondheim <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I played with this online after seeing it on Google+ - it's amazing
>>>>> and graphically really interesting!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Bj?rn Magnhild?en wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  A wordless open semantic form of social interaction between humans
>>>>>> and bot
>>>>>> http://noemata.net/chatasemic/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  [human_bot.png]
>>>>>> human + bot
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [3humans_bot.png]
>>>>>> 3 humans + bot
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ==
>>>>> email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>>>>> web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
>>>>> music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
>>>>> current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tc.txt
>>>>> ==
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NetBehaviour mailing 
>>>> [email protected]http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to