Can you say more?

On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Pall Thayer wrote:

Alan: But isn't that the whole idea behind left-acceleration?

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 9:46 AM Alan Sondheim <sondh...@panix.com> wrote:

      I agree and the problem precisely is acceleration; the biosphere
      doesn't
      adapt well to accelerated change, as the plights of sealions,
      walrus,
      migrant birds, ocean lives, indicate. If anything, a form of
      holding-back,
      learning to listen, listening, is necessary. The fundamental
      problem I
      think is that we're blind when it comes to ecosystems, energy,
      micro-
      biomes, and so forth. The fundamentals of mycology are being
      rewritten as
      we discuss, and what's emerging are whole universes of
      ignorance.
      Meanwhile we plow ahead, destroying the planet. It seems to me
      that
      accelerationism is so fundamentally human-based (perhaps
      man-based for all
      that), that it really overlooks collateral damage. And what do
      we do, for
      example, with the increasingly violent drought in the Mid-East
      which is
      exacerbating warfares and genocides? This needs slow, dirty work
      to deal
      with it, culture theory which listens, not only to humans, but
      to life and
      lives everywhere -

      Alan


      On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, ruth catlow wrote:

      > Yes Michael, and this is profoundly poetic.
      >
      > All human traditions, values and communities are dissolved in
      an acid bath
      > of everlasting agitation and uncertainty.
      >
      > What this passage does not describe though is a situation
      where the wider
      > ecologies of non-human planetary life, upon which we depend,
      are also
      > fatally eroded.
      > We need to sense and engage not just the real relations with
      "our kind"
      > (expanded to engage people and perspectives of all kinds (YES
      Gretta!)), but
      > beyond, with other species, and materials.
      >
      > This must include a correction to systems of dominance - to
      which Simon
      > points with his example of improper use of neuro-science to
      validate the
      > 'use' of humans.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > On 23/04/16 16:38, Michael Szpakowski wrote:
      >       Marx & Engels on accelerationism in 1848:
      >
      >       "The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly
      revolutionising
      >       the instruments of production, and thereby the relations
      of
      >       production, and with them the whole relations of
      society.
      >       Conservation of the old modes of production in unaltered
      form,
      >       was, on the contrary, the first condition of existence
      for all
      >       earlier industrial classes. Constant revolutionising of
      >       production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social
      conditions,
      >       everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the
      bourgeois
      >       epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen
      relations,
      >       with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and
      >       opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become
      antiquated
      >       before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into
      air, all
      >       that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled
      to face
      >       with sober senses his real conditions of life, and his
      relations
      >       with his kind."
      >
      >          This does the *descriptive* job as well as anything
      written
      >       since and it still stands perfectly well...
      > Sent from my iPhone
      >
      >
      > _______________________________________________
      > NetBehaviour mailing list
      > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
      > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
      >
      >
      >
      > --
      > Co-founder Co-director
      > Furtherfield
      >
      > www.furtherfield.org
      >
      > +44 (0) 77370 02879
      > Meeting calendar - http://bit.ly/1NgeLce
      > Bitcoin Address 197BBaXa6M9PtHhhNTQkuHh1pVJA8RrJ2i
      >
      > Furtherfield is the UK's leading organisation for art shows,
      labs, & debates
      > around critical questions in art and technology, since 1997
      >
      > Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company limited by Guarantee
      > registered in England and Wales under the Company No.7005205.
      > Registered business address: Ballard Newman, Apex House, Grand
      Arcade, Tally
      > Ho Corner, London N12 0EH.
      >
      >

      ==
      email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
      web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
      music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
      current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt
      ==_______________________________________________
      NetBehaviour mailing list
      NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
      http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

--
P Thayer, Artist
http://pallthayer.dyndns.org



==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to