Holger Rabbach wrote:
>Is it true that men with the biggest signatures have the smallest
>dicks...?
I wouldnt know, but to be big or small, thats a relative thing, so
lets make a comparisation with two chosen signatures.
When it comes to the size of dicks, you surely cant count what you
cant see, so I've removed the spaces and compacted them into rows
of 40 characters;
Rob.----GraniteCityRoadsters,Aberdeen,Sc
otland.RobertInglis=============rai@csd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:http:
//www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Track/8980
/TheHeartbeatofAmerica:Today'sChevrolet_
__________//____/////________//______/Po
ntiac : Driving *EXCITEMENT*
HolgerRabbach--_________________________
________________________________________
_______HAAGE&PARTNERComputerGmbHAMIGADEV
ELOPMENTSSchlossbornerWeg7,61479Glashuet
ten,GermanyAmigaOSandPowerPCFon:+49-6174
-9661-00Fax:-01StormC|ArtEffect|EasyWrit
er______________________________________
__________________________________http:/
/www.haage-partner.comINFORMATION:info@h
aage-partner.com <<
...judge for yourself
BTW; sometimes I get email form people with no signature at all, does this
mean that their dick-lenghts are aproximately endless ?
not to be taken seriously at all, (ps! notice the short sig...... damn,
there I stamped on my dick again.:)
--
Anbjorn Myren, Norway, A4000/040, IRC: Anmy, http://home.sol.no/~amyren/
