On 17-Jan-00, Paul Cundle wrote:
> But it also makes having the cache pointless. It's fine if you want to
> revisit a site several times in one session, but next time you boot up
> it has to download every site again - which is what a cache is
> supposed to avoid!
If you want the benefits of cache, then you have to put up with the costs.
No good whingeing about cache being there and then whingeing about what would
happen if it's not there. You can't have your cache and eat it too.
Regards
--
Entropy isn't what it used to be.
<tsb>
<sb> Support *Open Directory Project* No Banners, No junk--just information. It's
the way the WEB should be.
<sb>*ODP *is built by volunteers and owned by the community . *------->
http://dmoz.org <*-----------Check it out
<tsb>
<sb>*Patrick Ford Auckland, New Zealand*
<sb>*/#fidonet#/ 3:772/235.3 #/icq#/ 51642681*
<tsb>
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
