> > But it also makes having the cache pointless. It's fine if you want to
> > revisit a site several times in one session, but next time you boot up
> > it has to download every site again - which is what a cache is
> > supposed to avoid!
> If you want the benefits of cache, then you have to put up with the costs.
But there are no costs if you have a decent filesystem, and/or if you
set aside a small partition for it.
> No good whingeing about cache being there and then whingeing about
> what would happen if it's not there.
Whinging? Excuse me? Get your facts right. I'm just pointing out the
flaw in having your RAM in cache. I'm perfectly happy with it on my
HD, thankyou very much.
> <sb>*Patrick Ford
Paul C, peeved
--
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
