I was just going to bed, when Colin-Stewart Bridge Deady wrote this and I just HAD to
read it:
> > > As mentioned before I currently use ram: as my "cache" and like the
> > > fact that it gets cleared every reboot.
> > But it also makes having the cache pointless. It's fine if you want to
> > revisit a site several times in one session, but next time you boot up
> > it has to download every site again - which is what a cache is
> > supposed to avoid!
> Ahh but I find it works ok - you'd be suprised the amount of times I
> go around in circles in one session (eg: go to CUCUG... well b4 they
> left Amiga then to an article then back again to CUCUG then to another
> article, etc).
I suppose it depends what you want to do then. I find I regularly go
back to sites which don't change much, or only certain pages change.
In both cases, I'd rather have all the graphics (which make up most of
the data on web pages) cached.
> -Bridge
Paul C, sometimes
--
... Q: How many New Yorkers does it take to screw in a light bulb?
A: 50. 50? Yeah, 50! It's in the contract.
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
