On 29 Mar 2000 11:4:53 +0000, Andy Sillwood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 29-Mar-00 09:53:49, Kevin Fairhurst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >Surely WebVision would actually be transfering data, and thus would not be > >acting like a ping which just sends a couple of packets. > > Thats correct, if data is actually being transferred, it would not be classed > as a ping. Even if it is frequent, small transfers like with webvison, you > are still 'using' the connection. Hey, I hope you aren't advocating using WebVision to confuse the RedHotAnt system, allowing people to stay online without being linedropped? ;-) Kev -- Kevin "Redvers" Fairhurst - ICQ 56332267, redver5 on AIM _____________________________________________________________ NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe' message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [netconnect] Re: ReHotAnt delaying R... Andrew Guard
- [netconnect] Re: ReHotAnt delaying R... Ian Armstrong
- [netconnect] Re: ReHotAnt delaying R... Mac McGuire
- [netconnect] Re: ReHotAnt delaying R... Barry Wiringer
- [netconnect] Re: ReHotAnt delaying R... John Block
- [netconnect] Re: ReHotAnt delaying R... Ken Walsh
- [netconnect] Re: ReHotAnt delaying R... Mike Carter
- [netconnect] Re: ReHotAnt delaying R... Andrew Guard
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Kevin Fairhurst
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Andy Sillwood
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Kevin Fairhurst
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Andy Sillwood
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Ian Greenway
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Andy Sillwood
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems John Block
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Andy Sillwood
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems John Block
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems John Block
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Chris Wiles
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems Paul Cundle
- [netconnect] Re: redhotant problems John Block
