> discussed the subject. After almost a days use of 3.2, without > crashes, I think (don't want to be premature, but I might be right) > that version 3.2 is indeed more stable than any 3.x version before > that, and even more than 2.96. 2.96 was the only one I had working > without crashes at all (maybe it was just me being lucky?) Nope, this is answered in the V3.2 'readme' - that the history bug was fixed in 3.2, having previous caused random freezes/crashes in v3.0/a/v3.1 (ie. every release since the history re-write in v3.0/a). Chris. -- Chris Wiles Active Technologies - http://www.active-net.co.uk _____________________________________________________________ NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe' message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... John Block
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmail - ... Samuel Byford
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Ian Greenway
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Paul Cundle
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Chris Wiles
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Dirk Harlaar
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Ian Greenway
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Dirk Harlaar
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Ian Greenway
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Dirk Harlaar
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Chris Wiles
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Dirk Harlaar
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Ian Greenway
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Ian Greenway
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Dirk Harlaar
- [netconnect] Re: V? stable or... Jules
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmai... Chris Wiles
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmail Patrick Ford
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmail Samuel Byford
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmail Paul Cundle
- [netconnect] Re: No go Hotmail Matthew Bloomfield
