> discussed the subject. After almost a days use of 3.2, without
> crashes, I think (don't want to be premature, but I might be right)
> that version 3.2 is indeed more stable than any 3.x version before
> that, and even more than 2.96. 2.96 was the only one I had working
> without crashes at all (maybe it was just me being lucky?)

Nope, this is answered in the V3.2 'readme' - that the history bug was fixed
in 3.2, having previous caused random freezes/crashes in v3.0/a/v3.1 (ie.
every release since the history re-write in v3.0/a).

Chris. 

-- 
Chris Wiles
Active Technologies - http://www.active-net.co.uk

_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to