On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:17:19AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > I know there is not agreement on the solution yet.
Exactly. And hence talking about YANG 1.2 is simply confusing. > That is why it is an open issue. I2RS does not have to present NETMOD WG > with a solution (even though they did present an acceptable solution). If you mean duplication of data models and data model specific merge rules then I have trouble to believe this is desriable nor does it seem to reflect what other proprietary ephemeral datastore implementations do. > In order for I2RS to have the YANG validation rules that meet its > use-cases, new text is needed. This text needs to be associated > with data-nodes. > > I like the proposed solution of config=true,ephemeral,false > because I know none of the existing text inadvertently applies > to ephemeral nodes. I would prefer to have ephemeral datastore support as an extension; not all uses of YANG (perhaps even a big majority) require to describe ephemeral datastores. > I do not think YANG is fully specified wrt/ datastores because > operational state and ephemeral nodes are not separated. > An ephemeral datastore (and perhaps operational datastore) > are needed to solve this problem. But depending on the solution selected, this may not require any changes to YANG 1.1. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
