Hi Eric, If you have a proposal, please send. A draft seems overkill to me, but maybe you have something in mind?
I’m personally okay to name the schema-mount thing to something that doesn’t use the word “mount”, so long as it’s still easy to understand. Worst case we could all switch to using long form (e.g., schema-mount-point, instance-mount-point), what do you think? Kent On 2/23/16, 6:21 PM, "Eric Voit (evoit)" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Kent, > >Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful. > >One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition of >"Mount". Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which >refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much like >draft-clemm-netmod-mount). > >That does not mean that the IETF need define "Mount" the same way as an Open >Source project. But it is possible at this stage to create both terminology >and requirements which breaks down the overall problem space. In other words >there is nothing stopping us from defining a set of terms and technology >solutions which fit together in a complimentary way. Nothing here need >conflict. > >If there is community interest, I would be willing to pull together a strawman >requirements/terminology draft describing the differences between mounting >schemas on a box, mounting a remote datastore. > >Any interest? >Eric > >> From: netmod, February 22, 2016 3:51 PM >> >> >> Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting. >> >> Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the presentation >> order, >> I thought that the meeting went really well in that there seems to be a lot >> of >> support for trying to solve this problem, and because we have a plan to try >> to >> move towards having a WG document in the BA timeframe. The plan is for >> draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the meeting >> and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on the >> topic. >> >> Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting. >> Please review carefully. Corrections can be made on the etherpad here: >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 (so we can >> track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here: >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim- >> 20160222/timeslider#3933) >> >> To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links: >> >> Streaming recording link: >> >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953f4a2 >> >> Download recording link: >> >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913dfdc1f >> >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Kent and Lou > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
