> On Feb 24, 2016:2:39 PM, at 2:39 PM, Eric Voit (evoit) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> From: Nadeau Thomas, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
>>
>>> On Feb 23, 2016:6:21 PM, at 6:21 PM, Eric Voit (evoit) <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Kent,
>>>
>>> Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful.
>>>
>>> One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition
>>> of
>> "Mount". Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which
>> refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much like
>> draft-clemm-
>> netmod-mount).
>>>
>>> That does not mean that the IETF need define "Mount" the same way as an
>> Open Source project. But it is possible at this stage to create both
>> terminology
>> and requirements which breaks down the overall problem space. In other
>> words there is nothing stopping us from defining a set of terms and
>> technology
>> solutions which fit together in a complimentary way. Nothing here need
>> conflict.
>>
>> I agree that normalizing the terminology is probably a good thing. What
>> I would caution against is a unilateral definition here as it is likely to
>> be IETF-
>> centric; its a good idea to poll the other communities that are using this
>> technology.
>
> Makes sense. Any thoughts on who might represent the meaning of Mount from
> ODL?
I’d ask on the yangtools-dev or controller-dev lists.
—Tom
>
> Eric
>
>> —Tom
>>
>>
>>> If there is community interest, I would be willing to pull together a
>>> strawman
>> requirements/terminology draft describing the differences between mounting
>> schemas on a box, mounting a remote datastore.
>>>
>>> Any interest?
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>> From: netmod, February 22, 2016 3:51 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the
>>>> presentation order, I thought that the meeting went really well in
>>>> that there seems to be a lot of support for trying to solve this
>>>> problem, and because we have a plan to try to move towards having a
>>>> WG document in the BA timeframe. The plan is for
>>>> draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the
>> meeting and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on
>> the
>> topic.
>>>>
>>>> Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting.
>>>> Please review carefully. Corrections can be made on the etherpad here:
>>>> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 (so we
>>>> can track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here:
>>>> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-
>>>> 20160222/timeslider#3933)
>>>>
>>>> To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links:
>>>>
>>>> Streaming recording link:
>>>>
>>>> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953
>>>> f4a2
>>>>
>>>> Download recording link:
>>>>
>>>> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913df
>>>> dc1f
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>
>>>> Kent and Lou
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
