> On Feb 23, 2016:6:21 PM, at 6:21 PM, Eric Voit (evoit) <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kent,
> 
> Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful.    
> 
> One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition of 
> "Mount".     Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which 
> refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much like 
> draft-clemm-netmod-mount).   
> 
> That does not mean that the IETF need define "Mount" the same way as an Open 
> Source project.  But it is possible at this stage to create both terminology 
> and requirements which breaks down the overall problem space.   In other 
> words there is nothing stopping us from defining a set of terms and 
> technology solutions which fit together in a complimentary way.  Nothing here 
> need conflict.
        
        I agree that normalizing the terminology is probably a good thing.  
What I would caution against is a unilateral definition here as it is likely to 
be IETF-centric; its a good idea to poll the other communities that are using 
this technology.

        —Tom


> If there is community interest, I would be willing to pull together a 
> strawman requirements/terminology draft describing the differences between 
> mounting schemas on a box, mounting a remote datastore.
> 
> Any interest?
> Eric 
> 
>> From: netmod, February 22, 2016 3:51 PM
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting.
>> 
>> Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the presentation 
>> order,
>> I thought that the meeting went really well in that there seems to be a lot 
>> of
>> support for trying to solve this problem, and because we have a plan to try 
>> to
>> move towards having a WG document in the BA timeframe.  The plan is for
>> draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the meeting
>> and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on the 
>> topic.
>> 
>> Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting.
>> Please review carefully.  Corrections can be made on the etherpad here:
>> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222  (so we can
>> track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here:
>> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-
>> 20160222/timeslider#3933)
>> 
>> To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links:
>> 
>>  Streaming recording link:
>> 
>> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953f4a2
>> 
>>  Download recording link:
>> 
>> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913dfdc1f
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks again,
>> 
>> Kent and Lou
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to